Heart attack survivors who take one 50p tablet a day live longer, study claims

763     0
Aspirin is mandatory following a heart attack due to its ability to prevent the formation of blood clots (Image: Getty Images/Juice Images RF)
Aspirin is mandatory following a heart attack due to its ability to prevent the formation of blood clots (Image: Getty Images/Juice Images RF)

Heart attack survivors who take a 50p tablet every day, according to a new study.

Popping an aspirin every day means they are less likely to suffer another heart attack or stroke compared to those who don't consistently take the drug, say scientists. Study author Dr Anna Meta Kristensen said: "Our findings suggest that not taking aspirin as prescribed after a heart attack is linked to a higher risk of having another heart attack, a stroke or dying.

“We recommend that all patients who have had a heart attack stay adherent to their aspirin in accordance with guidelines until randomised controlled trials have proven otherwise, and clinical guidelines have been changed.”

Aspirin is mandatory following a heart attack due to its ability to prevent the formation of blood clots, which reduces the risk of a new heart attack or stroke. But with advances in treatment and diagnostic methods, the prognosis after a heart attack has improved and the long-term effects of aspirin are now less evident.

Because aspirin prevents the formation of blood clots, it also increases the risk of bleeding and the balance between the cardiovascular benefits and bleeding changes with time after a heart attack. The new study investigated the risk associated with discontinuation of long-term aspirin compared with continued use after a heart attack in a contemporary setting.

Baby boy has spent his life in hospital as doctors are 'scared' to discharge him eiqeuiqzhiqeinvBaby boy has spent his life in hospital as doctors are 'scared' to discharge him

Researchers used data from Danish nationwide health registries. It included patients aged 40 and over who had a first-time heart attack from 2004 through 2017, were treated with a coronary stent and took aspirin as prescribed during the first year afterwards.

Patients who were on anticoagulants or had a stroke or recurrent heart attack within the first year were excluded. Adherence to aspirin was evaluated at two, four, six and eight years after the heart attack.

In Denmark, every time a patient picks up a prescription of aspirin, the number of tablets and date of collection are recorded in registries. Adherence to aspirin at each of the four time points was assessed as the proportion of days patients had their pills over the preceding two years.

Patients on aspirin for 80 per cent or less of the time were considered non-adherent, while those on aspirin more than 80 per cent of the time were considered adherent. Dr Kristensen, of Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital in Denmark. said: “We assessed the effects of long-term aspirin use in patients who were not receiving other medications for the prevention of heart attack or stroke.

"Both anticoagulants and P2Y12 inhibitors are agents that, similar to aspirin, work to prevent the formation of blood clots. Therefore, patients undergoing such treatments were excluded from our study.” The study included more than 40,000 patients who suffered a first heart attack.

Adherence to aspirin progressively declined with each time point, from 90 per cent at two years following the heart attack to 84 per cent at four years, 82 per cent at six years and 81 per cent at eight years. The researchers analysed whether patients who did not take aspirin as prescribed had a higher risk of the composite outcome of recurrent heart attack, stroke or death compared with those who consistently took aspirin.

A number of factors that might affect the results were taken into account including age, sex, diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, kidney disease, cancer and stomach ulcers. At each time point, patients who took aspirin as prescribed were less likely to experience the composite outcome compared with non-adherent patients.

Compared with adherent patients, non-adherent patients had a 29 per cent, 40 per cent, 31 per cent and 20 percent higher likelihood of recurrent heart attack, stroke or death at two, four, six and eight years following the heart attack, respectively.

Dr Kristensen said: “Our results should be interpreted with caution because they show an association but do not establish causality. Since the study is registry-based, we do not have information about the specific reasons as to why patients did not take their aspirin.

"Furthermore, our findings cannot be generalised to all patients who experience a heart attack, as our study specifically focused on those who received treatment with a coronary stent and were not taking other medications to prevent blood clot formation."

Disabled woman paralysed after falling from wheelchair on plane walkway diesDisabled woman paralysed after falling from wheelchair on plane walkway dies

She added: "With that in mind, the results support current guidelines recommending long-term aspirin after a heart attack.” The findings are due to be presented at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress in Amsterdam.

Stephen Beech

Print page

Comments:

comments powered by Disqus